
Friday, November 16, 2007
The CFV Digital Back

Thursday, November 15, 2007
The 60-120 mm FE Zoom Lens
Using the V96C

Although, as I mentioned, the V96C digital back was cumbersome to use, I took some nice pictures around and about Leland, Michigan, my favorite place to photograph. At the left is Fishtown in downtown Leland. With the large 36X36 mm, 16 MB sensor I can easily enlarge my photos to the 20"X24" size that I like to use. Admittedly, the required cropping reduces the effective sensor size and as a result Hasselblad has now released a 22 MP sensor which is 48X36 mm but at an enormous price--more than an amateur photographer like myself can justify.
Getting the photos off of the imagebank was the trick. Firewire connectivity was not foolproof at the time I owned the V96C. Further, photos could only be accessed through the Imacon Flexcolor software and did not show up as a disk in Windows Explorer. I initially had much difficulty with the Firewire connectivity in my laptop until I was given a special cable by the folks at City Lights Digital where I bought the back. Due to the complexity of the device, I never would have gotten it to work without their help. After owning the V96C for a little over a year, Hasselblad introduced the CFV which resolved all of the difficulties with their initial attempt at digital. Unfortunately, the value of the V96C plummeted. But, that business model is common in today's world of digital photography. Gone are the days of owning the same device for 20 or 30 years, e.g., the Hasselblad 500.....
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
The V96C
The V96C was an amazing piece of electronic equipment--shown at the left--but with an astonishing number of shortcomings. The feature which possessed the best and worst qualities was the Imagebank external hard drive. The imagebank was the heart of the V96C. It contained an amazing 40 Gig harddrive which could hold 1000 of the large picture files. The battery attached to the imagebank so that the power button was there also instead of on the digital back. All communication to the back was through the imagebank which had to be linked to a computer as a device through a firewire port. The imagebank was heavy and tethered to the camera through a co-ax cable. I had a settup to hang it from the tripod. Since there was no removable storage media, the pictures could only be removed by hooking the imagebank to a computer. This was very cumbersome. Now, there's more to the Rube Goldberg-like story. I already mentioned that I have electronics in my Hasselblad. This was an experiment they undertook and then abandoned. However, the electronic Hasselblad is won
derful. Well, they don't like to adapt their digital backs to my model. So, it is necessary to somehow fire the digital back while the shutter is open--not an easy task. To do that a company called The Kapture Group has created a device--which costs about $400--to link the shutter realease, the PC post on the lens, and the digital back called the One shot cable release shown at the left. The PC post fires a flash so that signal is used for the back. I wish I had taken a picture of the tripod when all of these cables were connected--it was quite a sight! Next time I will talk about using the V96C.Tuesday, November 13, 2007
My First Digital Back
